The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what has not been done as far as I know is to compare early and ingested NR at say 600 milligram a relatively high dose versus a gram of sublingual nmn and then actually measure blood levels of NAD if that experiment has been done and I'm not aware of it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Compared to NAD precursors like NMN & NR, there’s almost nothing known about the effects of intravenous (IV) NAD+.
No, I haven't seen any reason for saying that you need to put it onto your tongue versus swallow it.
Yes, makes me wonder a lot about IV or SL NMN or NR vs oral.