Andrew Huberman· PhD
so NR supplementation may have legs.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so NR supplementation may have legs.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The double-blind trial revealed that NR not only safely boosted NAD+ levels but also improved cardiovascular health, reduced skin ulcers, and helped protect kidney function in patients.
Meanwhile human clinical trials on both compounds show promise.
A new clinical trial indicates it has some long-term beneficial effects in humans
The most evidence-backed way to boost cellular NAD is with the precursor nicotinamide riboside (NR), not with oral NAD or NMN supplements