Andrew Huberman· PhD
if um the food that that we eat is more alike we are more likely to to connect at least on the moment right so there is this aspect and that's why we share you know the food
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if um the food that that we eat is more alike we are more likely to to connect at least on the moment right so there is this aspect and that's why we share you know the food
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if we are what we eat then if we eat the same thing we should be more alike to each other right that's why you know like in communities uh you share the food in fact uh in like if you go into certain uh specific uh communities you pass around uh the food you pass around the the drinks you know and is a it's very common to share right