The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is a growing consensus among epidemiologists and epidemiological evidence along with clinical and nutritional evidence that's strong enough to suggest that new guidance should be issued in terms of how these different sources of tap water should enhance, not deplete the amount of magnesium and calcium in that water.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If, however, the water that you're drinking from the tap filtered or not, I would hope filtered contains less than 8.3 milligrams per liter of magnesium, well then chances are the pH of that water is going to be low enough that it's not going to be lending itself to some of the favorable health components that higher pH water can.