The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if you're eating a lot of resistant starches which actually are resistant to the digestion absorption and they shouldn't be a lot of them will get to the column a lot of food for the bacteria very high turnover of the bacteria and if you have a lot of the ground negative species a lot of endotoxin okay over time this irritates the intestinal wall
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the all of these everything that can give this bacteria to feed on specifically the carbohydrates whether they're resistant or not it's going to create a problem
and that they could increase endotoxin at the level of the gut increase the polysaccharide by feeding populations in the large intestine and then leading to inflammation throughout the human body endotoxin leading to triggering of tlr4 et cetera
I think that starchy foods like bread potatoes pasta rice are a problem for humans for a variety of reasons not least of which is gut inflammation leading to endotoxin and all of the downstream effects of that
if we consume the wrong types of fibers that end up in our large intestine and can contribute to overgrowth of bacterial there it can increase the polysaccharide