The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
as far as like the fruit like what and like the food matrix of it being like obviously fructose in like a juice format is not ideal compared to if you're just like eating a berry or like a banana or whatever and it's like has the i know fibrous components of it presumably so it's like slowing the i don't know spike in glucose
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the fructose molecule is the same whether it's in a berry or in a banana or or for that matter in a Coca-Cola the fructose molecule is the same molecule the difference is that in the berry it comes with a whole lot of fiber in the banana comes with a whole lot less fiber and in the Coca-Cola it doesn't come with any fiber
natural fruits are different so natural fruits have like much less fructose because in an individual fruit when you make fruit juice it's like multiple fruits that are put in there
natural fruits have like uh much less fructose uh because in an individual fruit when you make fruit juice it's like multiple fruits that are put in there