Paul Saladino· MD
but if you look at the actual carbon footprint of uh a specific amount of rice and a specific amount of beef beef is actually slightly lower so even there they don't actually the message is not backed by evidence
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but if you look at the actual carbon footprint of uh a specific amount of rice and a specific amount of beef beef is actually slightly lower so even there they don't actually the message is not backed by evidence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.