The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these are these are all phytochemical rich but these are the parts of a plant that plants don't want to get eaten quote unquote and so the question that i kind of ask is how evolved are we at detoxifying these chemicals or processing these chemicals from these parts of plants versus fruit which is something that it seems if i if i if i squint my eye plants a little bit the plants actually want us to eat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i just find it interesting that there are defense chemicals in plants and i think we should be aware of this and and try and understand uh where within the hierarchy of foods we should place vegetables that is stems roots leaves and seeds versus fruits
I eat some fruit people that know my stuff will know that I don't eat vegetables so I don't eat leaves or stems or roots or seeds of plants but um but there there are ways to eat plant Foods more than fruit um if you choose to do that I'm not a fan