The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
This is one of the first times in human evolution where we mostly eat out of a desire to consume food, not out of a need for food. Most everybody could go a fairly long period of time, just ingesting water and electrolytes. And not that I'm suggesting people do that, but let's face it. We largely eat nowadays because of a desire to eat, not a need to eat, and yet we need to eat on a fairly regular basis.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Basically what he said was, from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes sense that we should eat as often as we can, as much as we can, and as fast as we can.
We've all heard before that we are hardwired to pursue sugar, and to like fatty foods, and that calorie-rich foods are attractive to us for all sorts of reasons, you know, surviving famines, and things of that sort.
From an evolutionary standpoint, it makes sense that we should eat as often as we can, as much as we can, and as fast as we can.