Paul Saladino· MD
there are many things about plants that that is highly they're it's there from an evolutionary it's there from an evolutionary perspective to highly discourage animals from eating them
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are many things about plants that that is highly they're it's there from an evolutionary it's there from an evolutionary perspective to highly discourage animals from eating them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
plants and animals have been Co evolving for 450 million years and if you really look into botany it's so amazing the things that plants have evolved to discourage animals and insects from eating them
Plants wanna get eaten they have evolved mechanisms to sort of regulate how much they get eaten with other animals