The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The way that they defend themselves from animals that might want to eat them... They're defended with these sulfur molecules that, in the intact root, are inactive. The moment the tissues are disrupted, enzymes get to work and generate from those precursors kind of chemical warfare cylinders. The cylinders are opened, and we end up with these molecules that can fly through the air. They're volatile.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.