Paul Saladino· MD
there are there are hundreds of thousands of people National experiments all over the world there's no evidence that saturated fat is bad for humans it's something we would have eaten evolutionarily
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are there are hundreds of thousands of people National experiments all over the world there's no evidence that saturated fat is bad for humans it's something we would have eaten evolutionarily
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's no evidence that saturated fat is bad for humans it's something we would have eaten evolutionarily
I think saturated fat gets a bad rrap because of epidemiology associational studies but if you really dig into the data this is good for you and you'll feel it