The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
When you eat the animal nose-to-tail which would be reasonable amounts of protein a good amount of fat for fuel and then the organ meats whether it's liver kidney heart and then thinking about you know connective tissue and maybe a calcium source which we can talk about you're getting a really robust collection of nutrients I would argue you're getting everything human needs to function optimally
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.