The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these are the experiments where essentially an animal learns to uh uh uh consume a certain flavor because it learns it's going to be associated with nutrients later sort of the Paradigm for how you learn to consume bitter vegetables because they're good for you and you get nutrients
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but what they've discovered is it's very sensitive to what you tell the humans about the thing that they're going to consume so if you put nutritional labels where you show the different numbers of calories then basically they sort of adjust their expectations and nothing happens