The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
our cells are brilliant and if the cells aren't getting what they actually need to function properly they will drive you to eat until they get their needs met unfortunately because the ultra processed food is designed to be highly addictive and it's devoid of what the cells actually need for good function we end up eating ourselves into a grave
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
literally just giving people this Ultra processed food which is devoid of what our bodies need and and therefore will drive people to eat more
the reason we're eating excess calories the reason chronic nutrition is happening and the reason we are quite literally in the United States eating ourselves to death for the first time in human history is because we're not eating real food and we're eating 60 to 75% of our calories of ultra processed nutrient depleted foods that fundamentally don't give our cells what they need