The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you don't actually need someone to be motivated every day to do this you really just need them to be motivated for like one afternoon so that they change the environment a bit and that can actually serve them in some cases it can serve them for months but in most cases even food related cases it could serve them for the next three days or five days or seven days just by getting junk food out of the house that serves them for the next you know a couple days
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You don't actually need someone to be motivated every day to do this. You really just need them to be motivated for like one afternoon so that they change the environment a bit. And that can actually serve them in some cases it can serve them for months but in most cases even food related cases it could serve them for the next 3 days or 5 days or seven days um just by getting junk food out of the house that serves them for the next you know couple days.
look, there's a lot of lowhanging fruit that can be done here that you don't actually need someone, and this I think is one of the reasons why I like environment changes. You don't actually need someone to be motivated every day to do this. You really just need them to be motivated for like one afternoon so that they change the environment a bit.