Andrew Huberman· PhD
But the people with the highest microbial diversity at baseline were more like the fermented food folks and they had a benefit.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
But the people with the highest microbial diversity at baseline were more like the fermented food folks and they had a benefit.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And the key factor that came out was the baseline microbial diversity. And so the idea here was that people who had low diversity, like a compromised western diet, depleted diversity, when they stuffed all that fiber down their gullet, they actually had an adverse reaction to it.
those with the highest microbial diversity at baseline tended to be the people who had a more beneficial immune response to fiber