Paul Saladino· MD
Despite multiple randomized controlled trials in humans showing significant negative effects of increasing dietary PUFAs.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Despite multiple randomized controlled trials in humans showing significant negative effects of increasing dietary PUFAs.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Multiple controlled trials in humans, many of which are randomized, show significant negative effects of increasing dietary PUFAs.
There are multiple controlled trials in humans, many of which are randomized, showing significant negative effects of increasing dietary PUFA.
There are multiple controlled trials in humans, many of which are randomized, showing significant negative effects of increasing dietary PUFA.