The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so we're seeing uh you know the byproducts of kufa right it's peroxide in byproducts which we know are pathological we don't like them right most of the aldehydes are toxic which is one of the biggest ones one of the most common ones probably represents about 80 of the aldehydes produced uh you know degradatively from pufa uh it's a known carcinogen I think it was just just recently recognized that known carcinogenic mutation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.