The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
In the studies where they don't control calories, low GI tends to outperform high GI. But when they control calories, there's no difference. And so what I think that suggests is low GI foods, just by their nature, tend to be higher in fiber. And so I think it just kind of comes back to the fiber issue.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Other measures of dietary quality such as fiber or whole grains which is their words not mine may be more likely to predict health outcomes.
other measures of dietary quality i agree with that not this next statement such as fiber or whole grains disagree with that may be more likely to predict health outcomes but yes dietary quality fiber or whole grains no