The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if that sensitivity has changed meaning it could have change in how fast it reacts to the stimulus or how fast it communicates to the stimulus and how s sensitive it is to the saliency or like the the the strength of the stimulus it could communicate that o what it used to be repulsive with a tiny little bit of amount now it is actually pleasurable with a tiny little uh bit of amount
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.