The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
many of these nutrients have not been studied in organs in the human body so often we we don't for instance we don't know what's in a brain we don't really know what's in bone marrow we know what's in liver but we know I don't think we fully understand all the nutrients that are in the organ meats
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that there are probably growth factors and things in there that we are not even aware of that could be beneficial to the organ in our own body