The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
well there first of all there's lectins which are carbohydrate binding proteins which I think more and more people are starting to talk about you know and the idea is that these carbohydrate binding proteins and plants look very different than the lectins that are in animals and they can really interfere with our immune system
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
oxalates and lectins are a great example
because they're more compatible with your biology
we make a thousand lectins in our own bodies every day a thousand absolutely it's a broad class of compounds so to say all lectins are bad would be to say you must die yeah and also there are electives in the meat you eat they're just not yes they're us with you right exactly because they're more compatible with your biology
lectin compatibility is really the issue