We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and you basically just realize in the very same way like oh man like plants don't want to get eaten duh like there's something in every plant and you know we don't think fructose is beneficial long term and so why are we eating plants in general
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i have traditionally felt that the the assumption has always been that plants are benign and good for us and we should eat more plants and so it's been fun and interesting to kind of question that
But, rather, a specific meme that treats these plant compounds as evidence for an (extreme) way of eating when, if anything, it serves as better evidence for the exact opposite. Caution rather than zeal is warranted.