The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and all the other things that are in the honey that effect that really are like information i think people should think about this as like packets of information on the internet or light information like getting vitamin from the sun versus from a vitamin d supplement is these are completely different things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but foods in the whole food form have more information we see this with honey like you can give someone honey and they have increased nitric oxide precursors in their urine and the endothelium function gets better if the honey is good and then if you give somebody sugar which many people would say oh honey's just processed sugar all those things go the opposite direction you can see the same thing in animal models where you can give rats or mice sugar and they have all sorts of metabolic issues and you give them honey and they actually have the reverse