Paul Saladino· MD
if you're very active you may want to think about more carbohydrates in your diet if you're minimally active less carbohydrates are fine
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if you're very active you may want to think about more carbohydrates in your diet if you're minimally active less carbohydrates are fine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The amount of carbohydrates in your diet is going to scale based on how active you are
I think everyone should adjust or can consider adjusting their carbohydrate intake based on their activity level and what they're doing
No matter where you live, no matter how active you are, including some carbohydrates in your diet is a reasonable thing.
obviously scale the amount of carbohydrates in your diet based on your activity level
The amount of carbohydrates I eat in a day is dependent on how active I am.
Obviously, you should eat carbohydrates in proportion to your activity level. And I'm an active human.