The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we know the trans fat is harmful for humans because it increases their unboxing and decreases process cycling those are two competing arms of the clotting and anti-clotting or fibrinolytic Cascade respectively so anything that increases your clotting and decreases your ability to unclot or resolve clots fibrinolysis it's going to be problematic for humans and we know trans fats do that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we know the trans fat is harmful for humans because it increases through unboxing and decreases process cycling those are two competing arms of the clotting and anti-clotting or fibrinolytic Cascade respectively so anything that increases your clotting and decreases your ability to unclot or resolve clots fibrinolysis it's going to be problematic for humans
appears that trans fatty acids formed from the hydrogenation the heating of polyantaturated vegetable oils inhibit process cyclings and promote thromboxane in the clotting process being proclotting and antith thrombolytics making it more likely that you will clot
trans fats everyone knows are harmful for humans probably because they do a couple of things the level of clotting in humans