Paul Saladino· MD
i think it's like a shortcut that misleads people and they get very confused by food sensitivity tests
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
i think it's like a shortcut that misleads people and they get very confused by food sensitivity tests
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think it gets a little too myopically focused on the foods that are on the sensitivity test and they'll see what's on the sensitivity test and they'll say oh i'm not allergic to almonds so i can eat almonds and i'm like well i don't think almonds are good for humans no matter what even if you don't have an iv antibody to it