The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Caffeine rarely. So, like today I'm drinking I've got a tea mix. This one is um I forget the brand. This has 15 milligrams of caffeine, but I don't drink caffeine on a regular basis. To me, it's an escalation when I start doing it. Uh, I just have to have more and it just soon I get addicted. So, only on occasions like today, this is really fun. It's Sunday morning. I'm hanging out with you guys. I'm having fun. And 15 grams of caffeine is just a nice little boost.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.