The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at the data whatever you consume in your food over you know if if you average that out over a three year period you will approximately double that amount of La in your body fat now that's a rough estimate and it doesn't work at at the very lower end and it may not work at the very high end
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you have 21.5 of your body fat as omega-6 linoleic acid today and you go on a completely ancestral diet and you can get your omega-6 consumption down to one percent um and for the next three years in three years you should theoretically be down to around um you know three percent or less omega-6 linoleic acid in your body fat
I'm absolutely convinced that ancestral levels of omega-6 linoleic acid would be um about three percent maybe three point two percent possibly up to four percent but we should never be over four percent omega-6 linoleic acid in our body fat and probably under three