The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they have um exceedingly low sugar consumption it is the eighth lowest sugar consumption in the world and anybody who if you're looking at this graph or if you're not I'll describe it but you can see that sugar is in the green curb there and it has been ranging from about 60 to 80 calories per day in China since about 1980s and so that's that is um two and a half percent of their calories on average so it's virtually just almost negligible right and it's not changing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.