Andrew Huberman· PhD
So I think that as the data emerge, we're hearing more and more of these artificial sweeteners. Either are problematic or at least are signaling different events in the gut.
Loading…
Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
So I think that as the data emerge, we're hearing more and more of these artificial sweeteners. Either are problematic or at least are signaling different events in the gut.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.