The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
manganese is found in the liver and it's found in the bone so again we kind of return to this idea where is it in the animal and what do we need it for and this idea that if we're eating nose to tail I don't think we're gonna get a deficiency in something as long as we're eating the compartment of the animal that it's found in but yeah if you look at it manganese is reasonably found in the liver
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
manganese again we talked about that one in the liver yep in the liver again good source