Paul Saladino· MD
what is interesting for me about a true carnivorous diet which is a term that I will coin now to mean a nose to tail style of eating animals is that that really provides all of the nutrients that a human needs to thrive
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
what is interesting for me about a true carnivorous diet which is a term that I will coin now to mean a nose to tail style of eating animals is that that really provides all of the nutrients that a human needs to thrive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and in light of the fact that animal Foods when doing a nose to tail eating style like a true carnivore style can be fully nutritive for humans and create health
the muscle meat doesn't have a lot of copper the muscle meat doesn't have a lot of you know riboflavin the muscle meat doesn't have a lot of Foley so we need the the sort of oregon meats to complete the nutritional picture
I would say that an animal eaten nose-to-tail is the ultimate multivitamin for a human and you know we can break down specific examples of that but I don't think there's any better food for a human in terms of bioavailability in terms of the proper ratios of nutrients and in terms of the total cumulative sum of all the nutrients that you can get
there's pretty strong a nutritional evidence that the muscle meat of an animal is not nutritionally complete and I think that eating animal nose-to-tail makes sense evolutionarily and is more nutritionally robust