Peter Attia· MD
one of the other carcinogens we haven't really discussed which is essentially the second most prevalent um environmental trigger of cancer after smoking is obesity
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
one of the other carcinogens we haven't really discussed which is essentially the second most prevalent um environmental trigger of cancer after smoking is obesity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
obesity is clearly driving cancer not all cancers but many cancers about two-thirds of cancers have a very strong tie to obesity I think if you look under the hood of that you'll realize it's probably not the excess fat per se or the adiposity that's driving cancer and rather it's the growth factors that are doing it so obesity comes with more inflammation comes with more growth factors such as insulin and igf and it seems more likely that those are the things that are actually leading the increase uh in cancer
I think we have a pretty good idea first of all I don't think it's the excess at aity right like I don't I don't think it's the extra two pounds I have on my waist that I wish I didn't have for vanity purposes um it is the environment of growth factors that comes with obesity namely the hyperinsulinemia but also the chronically elevated igf and things of that nature and it is the inflammatory environment that comes Rife with obesity