The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
not particularly yet. there was like this one um signaling molecule that they looked at which seems to activate these particular cells and um there's certainly like something that we could do in terms of developing drugs against that sign signaling molecule but we don't have anything for it yet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
at this point really the only the only thing we know of that affects that signaling molecule is polyphenols which is basically these compounds that you get from plants.