The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the other one um as I understand is vertical isaf gastrectomy and this vertical s gastrectomy is simply a a reduction in the size of the stomach so is now the stomach is very tiny and the idea is that will accumulate uh less it could hold less food and then the food will go very rapid rapidly into the intestine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.