The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
same thing you know they're both necessary but if the balance is thrown off then you have one you know in particularly if there's too much omega-6 is rare there's too much omega-3 there's too much of mega six you have a pro-inflammatory environment which you can you again you can fix just by adjusting the balance not necessarily by eliminating one you know over the other
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you need to have a one-to-four or a one-to-one ratio somewhere in that range we need to have a range in a ratio of meat from animals of organ meat from animals in the connective tissue of animals and it's probably close to a third a third a third to be quite honest right
And then I will just show the person like, "Okay, in your current diet, this is what your body is sensing." And you know, for the most part, I'm looking for an omega-6 to omega-3 ratio approximately four or less.
Most people, you know, before they start eating omega-3s, they sometimes have ratios 15:1, 20:1, and that's very pro-inflammatory when you have that much omega-6s floating around in your system.