We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I think that the problem that I think we run into with fish oil supplementation is that it gives us our body tons of these polyunsaturated fat that has to protect from oxidation and so we might be sacrificing oxidative stress for metabolic health when we could have just corrected that in the first place by not overeating linoleic acid
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
these results demonstrate that supplementing the diet with omega-3 fatty acids resulted in an increase in lipid peroxidation oh that's bad as measured by plasma mda which is malindialdehyde release and lipid peroxide products which was not suppressed by vitamin e supplementation
do you still think eating four grams consuming four grams of fish oil a day is good I hope not
Akkermansia muciniphila looks promising for gut-barrier integrity in older adults — a small RCT showed improved metabolic markers.