Andrew Huberman· PhD
The point here is that, if one doesn't see themselves regularly consuming these fish sources of omega-3s, it seems to me that the only way to really get them is from supplementation.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
The point here is that, if one doesn't see themselves regularly consuming these fish sources of omega-3s, it seems to me that the only way to really get them is from supplementation.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And supplementation is a good way to get a high dose.
in fact most of the studies that we talked about today involved getting two or even two and a half or in some cases on this podcast with previous guests such as Dr Rhonda Patrick she talked about the advantages of getting as high as three grams of Omega-3s per day which almost with certainty is going to require some external form of supplementation
And for that reason, I and many other people choose to supplement with a minimum of 1 gram per day and in some cases as high as 2 grams per day of omega 3s in supplement form.
for a therapeutic effect you probably at least in the studies that I've read you know doses have to go much higher than 450 milligrams they they were taking pretty high doses that were you know three grams a day