Andrew Huberman· PhD
It is possible to get omega-3s from meats. If the animals have grazed on grasses that contain a lot of omega-3s.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
It is possible to get omega-3s from meats. If the animals have grazed on grasses that contain a lot of omega-3s.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
go for the fatty fish cod liver salmon roe salmon fatty meat all those kind of things fatty meat iberian pork fat potentially lamb lambs of pretty that's like land salmon people refer to it as get some of that grass-fed New Zealand lamb kidney fat suet
I think there's plenty of ways for humans to get omega-3 without eating fish you can get it from butter you can get it from animal fat like the actual fat and steaks has omega-3 you can get it from egg yolks if you're not sensitive
Now, omega-3s, like EPA and DHA, are generally healthy for humans. You can get them from egg yolks. You can get them from grass-fed meat, but for some reason, people seem obsessed with getting them from fish. I don't believe humans need to eat fish to get enough omega-3s, and I think there are better sources.