Peter Attia· MD
So bone loss due to you know disuse osteopenia is incremental and it's progressive with time and it occurs more rapidly as you would guess in the tracular bone than in the cortical bone.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So bone loss due to you know disuse osteopenia is incremental and it's progressive with time and it occurs more rapidly as you would guess in the tracular bone than in the cortical bone.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So as the name suggests disuse osteopenia occurs when bones are chronically unloaded leaving to a very unfavorable combination of high bone uh resorption and low bone formation.
bone loss due to you know disuse osteopenia is incremental and it's progressive with time and it occurs more rapidly as you would guess in the tracular bone than in the cortical bone.
disuse osteopenia occurs when bones are chronically unloaded leading to a very unfavorable combination of high bone uh resorption and low bone formation.