Andrew Huberman· PhD
Nor is there a single disease of brain or body that has not been shown to benefit from having some antioxidant interference get in the way of that oxidative process.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Nor is there a single disease of brain or body that has not been shown to benefit from having some antioxidant interference get in the way of that oxidative process.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
There are many different theories of aging. There are many different theories of disease, but there is not a single disease, either of brain or body that doesn't in some way involve the generation of what are called reactive oxygen species, these free radicals and the damaging of cells at the level of their individual organelles and so forth.