Andrew Huberman· PhD
it was common 60s and 70s extremely common ' 80s very very common
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it was common 60s and 70s extremely common ' 80s very very common
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
' 90s when testing started becoming a bit better much less common 2000s 2010s and 20s I just don't know how much of it is getting done now or being done across the board