Andrew Huberman· PhD
So, the thought was that it could help them with - their nausea. - Yeah. I see. - But it ended up causing horrible birth defects. - I see. - Children were born without limbs, and so it was taken off the market.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, the thought was that it could help them with - their nausea. - Yeah. I see. - But it ended up causing horrible birth defects. - I see. - Children were born without limbs, and so it was taken off the market.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.