The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and this has been histologically verified in study after study meaning we take a biopsy of the skin have them start a prescription retinoid rebiopsy the skin and stain it for collagen or elastin and you see a market Improvement
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the first is the family of retinoids amazing medications amazing drugs been around for 50 years they come in oral form and topical form and these increase the time or they shorten the time they increase the skin turnover from 28 days to somewhere between 7 to 9 days and in doing so they've been shown to decrease skin cancer and pre-cancer formation they've been actually shown to grow new collagen they've been to increase elastin in appearance