The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And so, you know, there's a lot of cannabis that's really bred to be very high, very potent THC. And there's cannabis where the THC's bred completely out. So there's stories, you know, from Colorado, right? This strain of cannabis that's THC free, there's no THC at all, and it's all CBD, and it's called Charlotte's Web.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
CBD like doesn't really exist in any form of Street cannabis and it hasn't for a very long time you meaning there's no CBD in there there's some there's very very low levels of CBD and the reason that is is because THC and CBD are both made from the same precursor molecule and which direction it goes in is based purely on which synthetic enzyme converts it to either THC or CBD
in the analysis that Nick jomas did of all these strains and types of cannabis that exist uh in the United States when they went through their thing of thousands and thousands of kinds of cannabis it was like 3% of them maybe had like more than 1% CBD like it's very low like there's almost none and in Canada to get a CBD Rich strain you have to basically explicitly buy it because it has to be bred to make CBD
as people have clearly chased THC and wanted cannabis that's rich in THC and so cannabis has been bred to become higher content in THC by default CBD has been bred out of the plant and it has largely been bred out of the plant for quite some time