Andrew Huberman· PhD
and that likely might be because of the rate of absorption because of the fiber content
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and that likely might be because of the rate of absorption because of the fiber content
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it may not even be apples to apples when we're comparing leucine to leucine the leucine and in plant foods my tea might be half as worthwhile or only worth half as much as the leucine in animal foods and we don't really know