Peter Attia· MD
if we're really trying to put muscle on people and their training volume is high we're closer to two Gam per kilo
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if we're really trying to put muscle on people and their training volume is high we're closer to two Gam per kilo
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what was really found in that study was that even going from like 1.2 g per kilogram body weight per day obviously to 1.6 six grams per kilogram body weight people gained about 27% more lean body mass and 10% more muscle strength
A key meta-analysis led by @mackinprof shows that supplementing resistance training with extra protein can boost lean body mass by up to 27%.
Integrating up to 1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight with your training could increase lean body mass by as much as 27% more than through training alone.
So the meta-analysis was essentially then an attempt to reconcile, you know, "We've got all of these studies. What does protein do for lean body mass?" And the answer is, if you're younger and you're resistance training, so you're lifting weights, you want to get a bit bigger, a bit stronger, 1.6 grams of protein per kilo per day was the type of intake that you need to consume. But the effect is small.
with increasing amounts of protein so when you start to get up to like for younger people 1.6 grams per kilogram body weight was associated with a modest increase in muscle mass but it was very minor increase in strength