Paul Saladino· MD
in his in his epidemiology study what you will find is that those who ate less protein under age 65 had better outcomes but those who ate less protein over age 65 had worse outcomes
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in his in his epidemiology study what you will find is that those who ate less protein under age 65 had better outcomes but those who ate less protein over age 65 had worse outcomes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
low protein intake is associated with a major reduction in igf-1 cancer and overall mortality in the 65 and younger but not older population
it is an epidemiology study claiming that low protein intake is associated with a major reduction in igf-1 cancer and overall mortality in the 65 and younger but not older population